Brief: First Tulip Festival Parade

The first annual Tulip Parade began at Rideau and King Edward. Image: May 15, 1965 // Ted Grant Series 65-121; Library & Archives Canada.
The first annual Tulip Parade began at Rideau and King Edward. The Bourque Memorial Building was only about 18 months old at the time. Image: May 15, 1965, Ted Grant Collection Series 65-121 // Library & Archives Canada.

May 15, 1965 was the fourteenth annual Tulip Festival and it featured the first ever Tulip Festival parade.

Continue reading Brief: First Tulip Festival Parade

Laurentian Terrace: The Dominion’s Residence for Women in Ottawa

At the top-right, Laurentian Terrace. Home to countless female civil servants between 1943 and 1964. Image Source: Lost Ottawa [Facebook].
At the top-right, Laurentian Terrace. Home to countless female civil servants between 1943 and 1964. The round section is the cafeteria. The larger building to the left is the former Dominion Printing Bureau and if the image were taken today, the National Gallery is what you’d see. Image Source: Lost Ottawa [Facebook]. Colour correction, my own.
As Canada’s war effort continued through the early 1940s, the number of civil servants increased along with it. Many men were serving overseas and hundreds of young women were hired (after an initial lull) to work as stenographers and other junior administrators. When they arrived in the city from around the country (or left their parents’ Ottawa homes), they needed shelter.

Continue reading Laurentian Terrace: The Dominion’s Residence for Women in Ottawa

More of Maud’s Mortar

The Gilbert Apartments still stand, but not for long. Image: January 2015.
The Gilbert Apartments still stand, but not for long. Image: January 2015.

Back in 2013, when I began writing short histories for Ottawa Start, the second story that I had published was about the boarded up, derelict Gilbert Apartments at 293 Lisgar Street. Constructed by Miss Maud Thoburn, I wrote

Maud worked as a Departmental Inspector with the Post Office and was quite active in the community, her name frequently found in the social pages of both the Citizen and the Journal. It is unclear whether she later purchased the lot to construct the apartment, or if the property had remained in the family and she simply inherited it as the eldest daughter following the death of her parents. Nevertheless, she commissioned Werner Noffke to design a six unit apartment building on the lot that she would herself live in.

Maud occupied Apartment No. 4 in her building from its completion in 1939 until 1980, when she moved to 207 MacLaren. At 98 years, it [may have been] that climbing the stairs to her apartment became challenging and home with an elevator became necessary. She did not live there for long, however, she died the following year. Clearly, a woman who enjoyed a full life and although it’s not for much longer, one whose contribution to Ottawa’s urban fabric has remained with us.

Little has changed since I wrote that short story. The building remains standing in very much the same state. During a previous visit to LAC, I had some spare time and decided to take a look at the plans on microfiche. Remembering this story, “Job 994” stuck out in my mind. Although everything seems to be in order, it appears that the front elevation of the building was modified at some point to balance out the windows while adding one to the corner. I am not certain about when this happened1It’s worth noting that the building was originally designed with two floors. The third was added following the initial design.. The remaining elevations have remained unchanged, save for the removal of the fire escapes.

Notes

Notes
1 It’s worth noting that the building was originally designed with two floors. The third was added following the initial design.

White House Apartments, Redux

We return to the front entrance of the White House Apartments. Image: January 2015.

If you will remember, last year I wrote about some of the “excitement” that took place in the apartment building that I live in. Although I provided something of a nice overview of the events of the property, I was wholly unclear about how the specific building came to be. For an unrelated purpose, I paid a visit to the City of Ottawa Archives and once I was finished collecting what I was looking for1M.A. Seymour’s “Ottawa Land Enquiry” (1953)., I decided to explore the open stacks in the city’s beautiful facility at 100 Tallwood Drive.

Continue reading White House Apartments, Redux

Notes

Notes
1 M.A. Seymour’s “Ottawa Land Enquiry” (1953).

Sugarman & Diamond commission a Toast to Miss Harmon

The "Harman Apartments" serve as a tribute to the late Miss Harmon. Source: Christopher Ryan, December 2013.
The “Harman Apartments” serve as a (misspelled) tribute to the late Miss Harmon. Source: Christopher Ryan, December 2013.

About a year ago, when I wrote about the tragic experience of Ottawa’s Miss Harmon, I intended to continue and write about the subsequent development of this busy corner of Centretown. As it would turn out, the use of 171 MacLaren for educational purposes did not end with Miss Harmon’s suicide.

Continue reading Sugarman & Diamond commission a Toast to Miss Harmon

Projections on the Sky

The Auto-Sky Drive-In was located at the corner of Baseline and Fisher. Image: geoOttawa (1958) Aerial.
The Auto-Sky Drive-In was located at the corner of Baseline and Fisher. Image: geoOttawa (1958) Aerial.

Although they have come to occupy a somewhat legendary position in North American popular culture, the glory days of the drive-in theatre were actually somewhat short-lived, being largely confined to the 1950s. As the 1960s progressed and indoor theatres were constructed in the suburbs1In Ottawa, we saw the St. Laurent (1967), Place de Ville (1971), Capitol Square (1972), Britannia Six (1977; on the site of the Britannia Drive-In), the Cineplex Vanier (1980), and Westgate (1980). These were in addition to the numerous theatres constructed further out from Centretown between 1946 and 1949. Among these were the Linden, Eastview, Elmdale, and Nelson [Bytowne], to name a few., the popularity of drive-in theatres waned. This is to say nothing of the quickly rising property values as suburban sprawl more often than not came to surround drive-ins acros the country. Nevertheless, their popularity in Canada was unmatched anywhere in the world, save for the United States.2Canada was the only other country in the world to have them in the 1940s and at their peak there were more than 300 in operation across the country. This is also notable because Quebec had banned them outright until 1967. See Kerry Seagrave (1992) Drive-In Theaters: A History from Their Inception in 1933.

For a magical 15 year period, as Ottawa’s suburbs grew in the immediate postwar period, it became an increasingly unattractive proposition to pile the family into the Rambler and head downtown just for a movie. Combine that with the new intense love affair with everything automotive3Today’s “…but on the internet” form of innovation was “…but from my car” during the 1950s. That era saw the rapid adoption by businesses of any tactic that would keep their client in their vehicle. From the still-ubiquitous restaurants to dry cleaners, “drive-in” was a hot trend., and the time was right for drive-ins to spread.

As soon as Canada’s first was constructed at Stoney Creek in 1946, the interest of entrepreneurs across the land was piqued. Indeed, the first mention of a drive-in theatre in the Ottawa Journal was actually a notice of a debenture issue by Skyway Drive-In Theatres Ltd., the company that opened the drive-in at Stoney Creek. Their expansion plans included the construction of as few as five drive-ins.

Debentures under the stars. Source: Ottawa Journal, August 30, 1946, Page 13.
Debentures under the stars. Source: Ottawa Journal, August 30, 1946, Page 13.

As they continued to pop up across the country, it was about time that Ottawa received its own as well. And for that, there was something of a race. The first to announce was the Auto-Sky. Company president Jack Chater had experienced the one at Stoney Creek and teamed up with local farmers Clarence Seabrook and Mervyn Sheppard to plan their venture. The announcement, which was published in the October 31, 1947 edition of the Journal, stated that the Drive-In was to open around May 1 and begin with a capacity of 500 cars, with a planned subsequent expansion to 1,000.

The Auto-Sky was announced on October 31, 1947. Source: Ottawa Journal, October 31, 1947, Page 2.
The Auto-Sky was announced on October 31, 1947. Source: Ottawa Journal, October 31, 1947, Page 2.

In spite of the announcement saying that work had begun, the property transfer hadn’t been completed until January.4Ottawa Journal, March 5, 1948, Page 16. Perhaps a little foreshadowing. In the meantime, Ault-Kinney partnered with Toronto’s Park Drive-Ins and announced the construction of a Drive-In in the Britannia area. While the papers didn’t mention anything resembling a race, Ault-Kinney’s project beat the Auto-Sky to the punch by two weeks, opening on July 15, 1948. That evening, 1,000 cars packed into the new venue and seven police officers directed traffic.5Ottawa Journal, July 16, 1948, Page 17.

No, the Auto-Sky didn't end up being the first in the region as intended when announced. That fact didn't hold Chater & Co. back, however. Source: Ottawa Journal, July 28, 1948, Page 21.
No, the Auto-Sky didn’t end up being the first in the region as intended when announced. That fact didn’t hold Chater & Co. back, however. Source: Ottawa Journal, July 28, 1948, Page 21.

While the Auto-Sky may have lacked a little of the flash and big-name support of the Ottawa [Britannia] Drive-In, it had its own charm and its own audience. Two weeks following the opening of the drive-in at Britannia, the Auto-Sky had its opening night, showing to 600 patrons. According to Auto-Sky president Jack Chater, the “drive-in was intended primarily for the farmers of the Ottawa district, who could drive in after finishing their chores and watch a show with the family. For that reason we let the kids in free of charge.”6Ottawa Journal, July 29, 1948, Page 6.

The Auto-Sky, outlined here in blue, hugged the Ottawa-Nepean border. Map Source: Federal District Commission (1954)
The Auto-Sky, outlined here in blue, hugged the Ottawa-Nepean border. Map Source: Federal District Commission (1954)
The Auto-Sky's inaugural season ended with a comedy night. That evening's temperature was an unseasonably warm 7 degrees celsius. Source: Ottawa Journal, November 13, 1948, Page 14.
The Auto-Sky’s inaugural season ended with a comedy night. That evening’s temperature was an unseasonably warm 7 degrees celsius. Source: Ottawa Journal, November 13, 1948, Page 14.

From there, the Auto-Sky served the surrounding areas well. The challenge appears to have come quickly, however. As early as 1960 there were rumours flying around that it was up for sale to be redeveloped as a shopping centre.7Ottawa Journal, October 4, 1960, Page 3. While Auto-Sky manager Jack Critchley quickly denied it8Ottawa Journal, October 6, 1960, Page 3., the rumours hadn’t emerged from nowhere.

As early as 1963, the Auto-Sky was beginning to get a reputation for mixing family fare with films that are a little more ...blue. Source: Ottawa Journal, October 19, 1963, Page 21.
As early as 1963, the Auto-Sky was beginning to get a reputation for mixing family fare with films that are a little more …blue. Source: Ottawa Journal, October 19, 1963, Page 21.

While most of the city’s energy was spent during 1962-63’s drafting of the comprehensive zoning bylaw on the argument over building heights, there was a smaller battle brewing. The Auto-Sky, the only drive-in within the City of Ottawa’s boundaries, wanted the ability to open on Sundays like most theatres. The city hemmed and hawed: the fear seemed to be about traffic more than anything, but it was ultimately granted. This was, however, just a small speed bump. As early as 1963, the drive-in was receiving criticism for its double features being a little racy.

In the spring of 1965, the Auto-Sky was sold to Odeon Theatres. Source: Ottawa Journal, April 17, 1965, Page 52.
In the spring of 1965, the Auto-Sky was sold to Odeon Theatres. Source: Ottawa Journal, April 17, 1965, Page 52.

In the spring of 1965, the Journal announced that the Auto-Sky had been sold by owner William Freedman to the Odeon chain of theatres, bringing the chain’s total to four theatres in Ottawa.9Ottawa Journal, April 17, 1965, Page 52. The following year Odeon made some upgrades to the concession. It appears that the Auto-Sky, with Odeon’s backing did well enough, albeit at a more subdued level.

In 1973, then owners, Beeandbee Theatres Ltd., requested a rezoning of the property from low-density residential to what they characterized as “medium density.” The proposal brought hundreds of local residents out to object. Packed houses with local residents protesting the appearance of 8-12 storey “towers”, traffic, and altogether unwanted density. Some even raised the spectre of l’Affaire Dasken as a show of community power. The city received a last-minute Hail Mary when it became clear that the local sewer system could not handle the additional population and the rezoning was delayed until the upgrades were planned.10Ottawa Journal, November 8, 1973, Page 3.

1973-09-21-Opposition-to-Rezoning-Reduced-Page-4
The spectre of 8-10 storey apartment buildings aroused community opposition. Source: Ottawa Journal, September 21, 1973, Page 4.

Two years following, in 1975, another rezoning request was made for the property, this time from New Eden Developments. Community opposition, in this case, was also swift. This time, the City didn’t have the ability to kick the ball further down the field, however. Confronted with the issue, the Board of Control rejected the request out of hand. Auto-Sky, the little drive-in that couldn’t, remained precariously doomed to remain in operation.

Ottawa was able to kick the ball further down the field thanks to a lack of sewer capacity. Source: Ottawa Journal, November 8, 1973, Page 3.
Ottawa was able to kick the ball further down the field thanks to a lack of sewer capacity. In 1975, the Board of Control rejected the request out of hand. Source: Ottawa Journal, November 8, 1973, Page 3.

Had the Auto-Sky been considered a good neighbour, the re-zoning application’s opposition may have been somewhat more muted than it was. However, the proposal took place in a time when the neighbourhoods were becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the films being shown. After it had changed hands from Odeon to Beeandbee (and later to New Eden), the programming became even more …titillating. Indeed, the films shown by the mid-1970s made the “adult” films being shown the previous decade seem downright quaint.

Fisher Heights and Courtland Park were probably more offended by the re-zoning application than they were the programming. It didn't make it well-loved though. The “Love Camp 7” and “9 Ages of Nakedness” double-header was actually a replacement for the cancelled “Ginger” and “The Love Object”. Sources: Ottawa Journal, April 12, 1973, Page 46; Ottawa Journal, May 31, 1973, Page 50.
Fisher Heights and Courtland Park were probably more offended by the re-zoning application than they were the programming. It didn’t make it well-loved though. The “Love Camp 7” and “9 Ages of Nakedness” double-header was actually a replacement for the cancelled “Ginger” and “The Love Object”. Sources: Ottawa Journal, April 12, 1973, Page 46; Ottawa Journal, May 31, 1973, Page 50.

With the well downright poisoned, it appears that both parties had gone for broke. On May 11, 1974, based on neighbour complaints, the Ottawa Police showed up at the Auto-Sky and seized the prints of a recently-run triple-bill: A House Near the Prado, The Touch of Her Flesh, and A Hard Man is Good to Find. The Morality Unit of the Ottawa Police found the first two passable, but it was the last one resulted in obscenity charges being filed.11Ottawa Citizen, May 22, 1974, Page 15; Ottawa Journal, May 23, 1974, Page 30; Ottawa Journal, June 12, 1974, Page 7.

It wasn't difficult to see why local parents weren't especially appreciative of the Auto-Sky's programming decisions. Source: Movie Poster World.
It wasn’t difficult to see why local parents weren’t especially appreciative of the Auto-Sky’s programming decisions. Source: Movie Poster World.

Odeon, who continued to manage the theatre, agreed to show only clean films, and the obscenity charge was dropped. The Auto-Sky continued the amble along thereafter, though it was just a matter of time. The various owners of the land beneath were clearly interested in selling for development, and the neighbourhood around was neither friendly to the drive-in remaining nor was it anxious to see it go.

With less than a year remaining, the Auto-Sky received a last-minute stay of execution when 5/6 of Ottawa's theatres were shuttered due to the projectionists' lockout. Source: Ottawa Journal, July 30, 1980, Page 3.
With less than a year remaining, the Auto-Sky received a last-minute stay of execution when 5/6 of Ottawa’s theatres were shuttered due to the projectionists’ lockout. Source: Ottawa Journal, July 30, 1980, Page 3.

Aside from a temporary reprieve thanks to the film projectionists’ lockout in 1980 (The Auto-Sky was one of five “independents” in the city that could show films), the days were most certainly numbered. As with many of Ottawa’s properties, it came to be developed by Assaly. In this case, the developer was able to deliver it without the much-feared midrise development.

Source: Ottawa Citizen, March 31, 1983, Page 19.
Source: Ottawa Citizen, March 31, 1983, Page 19.

 

Notes

Notes
1 In Ottawa, we saw the St. Laurent (1967), Place de Ville (1971), Capitol Square (1972), Britannia Six (1977; on the site of the Britannia Drive-In), the Cineplex Vanier (1980), and Westgate (1980). These were in addition to the numerous theatres constructed further out from Centretown between 1946 and 1949. Among these were the Linden, Eastview, Elmdale, and Nelson [Bytowne], to name a few.
2 Canada was the only other country in the world to have them in the 1940s and at their peak there were more than 300 in operation across the country. This is also notable because Quebec had banned them outright until 1967. See Kerry Seagrave (1992) Drive-In Theaters: A History from Their Inception in 1933.
3 Today’s “…but on the internet” form of innovation was “…but from my car” during the 1950s. That era saw the rapid adoption by businesses of any tactic that would keep their client in their vehicle. From the still-ubiquitous restaurants to dry cleaners, “drive-in” was a hot trend.
4 Ottawa Journal, March 5, 1948, Page 16.
5 Ottawa Journal, July 16, 1948, Page 17.
6 Ottawa Journal, July 29, 1948, Page 6.
7 Ottawa Journal, October 4, 1960, Page 3.
8 Ottawa Journal, October 6, 1960, Page 3.
9 Ottawa Journal, April 17, 1965, Page 52.
10 Ottawa Journal, November 8, 1973, Page 3.
11 Ottawa Citizen, May 22, 1974, Page 15; Ottawa Journal, May 23, 1974, Page 30; Ottawa Journal, June 12, 1974, Page 7.

I ♥ Midcentury Vanier

Michel Circle. Image: November 2, 2014.
Michel Circle. Image: November 2, 2014.

I haven’t really formally editorialized much here on Margins, but I thought I’d take that opportunity to do so today. 

Most anybody who fell in love with midcentury architecture can probably pinpoint a moment at which they did. Whether it’s what they grew up with or whether it was a particular building that stuck out, we’ve all got it. Being from an area with very little of it constructed1Like many resource towns, construction tends to be done with a certain level of reluctance. The markets could be hotter than hot, but builders tend to take a somewhat longer-term approach., I wasn’t much exposed.

275-Michel

Then it happened. Although I’ve always been interested in buildings, cities, and architecture (the Charles M. Shields Library in South Porcupine can attest), I had never given it too much thought. As I’m apt to do, I was out for a walk during the spring of 2006. Living in Vanier at the time, I was meandering about the part of it north of Montreal Road2Ask me in person, I’ll tell you in person. Living on Deschamps was an adventure that year and made my way down St. Denis, past the recently closed École Cadieux.

I may as well have been walking through this aerial. At least it felt that way. Source: geoOttawa (1965 Aerials)
I may as well have been walking through this aerial. At least it felt that way. Source: geoOttawa (1965 Aerials)

Then it hit. I walked past 364 St. Denis. Stopped. Lingered. Took pictures. Then continued. 367. A gem! From there, I continued to explore Vanier north of Montreal road over the weeks. The level of care many of these properties receive is stupendous and I very much felt like I was walking through time.

367 St-Denis. Source: Google Maps (Street View).
367 St-Denis. Source: Google Maps (Street View).

It was like I was walking through the glistening, new, clean images of midcentury suburban bliss. The ones that I saw in those ubiquitous Popular Mechanics encyclopedias. The ones I saw in the all-too-common depictions of those halcyon days past that infected movies of the 1980s as their directors were feeling those twinges of nostalgia.

It was there that I understood what they were after during that period. No, I am not one of those who actually believes in that ideal. I’m decidedly urban, compact, and foot-based in my preferences and what’s more is that I know that those still waters of the modern suburban idyll ran (and continue to run) deep. The idea is that on a quiet sunny Sunday morning, the light came through and I (at least feel) that my understanding of the ideal came to meet it.

Although it shouldn’t have been, the fact that it was Vanier was the pleasant surprise. With the recent attention paid to midcentury modern neighbourhoods like Briarcliffe, I’d love to see more light shone on others – Vanier’s first and foremost.

Over the next little while, I’d love to start the ball rolling.

Notes

Notes
1 Like many resource towns, construction tends to be done with a certain level of reluctance. The markets could be hotter than hot, but builders tend to take a somewhat longer-term approach.
2 Ask me in person, I’ll tell you in person. Living on Deschamps was an adventure that year

The Dominion of Rochesterville

Processed with VSCOcam with a7 preset

This is just a shortie to show that I’m alive.

This small commercial facade first captured my attention back in the spring of 2013. I walked past it last weekend when I was on the way to have brunch with a friend, so I took a quick snap and decided to briefly look into it. Located at 204 Lebreton St. S. (corner of Louisa), it has served the following purposes:

  1. Dominion Stores. Rochesterville and Mount Sherwood residents were likely more than happy to have a location to purchase groceries. What’s somewhat interesting is that an area of town that’s something of a food desert today1Though the area lacks the presence of a large grocery store, there are a few smaller stores that carry produce. Additionally, there are two community gardens nearby., there were at one point a large number of small groceterias.
  2. Lingerie. A small factory operated here assembling lingerie at what were advertised as rock-bottom prices. Given the offshoring and manufacturing revolution that began to take place 20-30 following, that bottom wasn’t so bottom. 65 years ago, it was a relatively expensive to purchase a “dainty negligee”. This is an aspect to local social history that could use a little more coverage.
  3. Cam Grant Electric. During the later 1950s and 1960s, many of Ottawa’s industrial and commercial properties were transformed. As more manufacturing became concentrated in cities like Montreal or Toronto2While these were always the dominant centres, in Ontario in particular, the manufacturing industry was traditionally more spread out across the province with more local concerns., such properties took on a more “heavy retail” feel. Today, we’d see more of these operations located in industrial parks than we would in “workers'”  or low-income neighbourhoods.
  4. Arctic Refrigeration.
  5. Battleship Linoleum.
  6. Built Ideas (contractor).
  7. A stained-glass shop.
  8. Stephen Fenn Photography.
  9. Today it’s occupied by StyleHaus, an interior designer.

Notes

Notes
1 Though the area lacks the presence of a large grocery store, there are a few smaller stores that carry produce. Additionally, there are two community gardens nearby.
2 While these were always the dominant centres, in Ontario in particular, the manufacturing industry was traditionally more spread out across the province with more local concerns.

Marvin of Troy (Marvin Chodikoff and the Construction of the Mark Building, 1959)

There are a number of stories to be told of this diminutive midcentury commercial block. We’ll all miss The Mayflower of course, but the block itself needs its story told. Image: August 19, 2014.

You may remember last fall when I wrote about the early beginnings of the Mayflower Restaurant at the south east corner of Elgin and Cooper streets. A legendary place of local communion in its own right, the Mayflower served its last in October and closed. Over the ensuing winter and spring, behind hoarding, the storied diner and pub (along with the neighbouring tailor) were transformed into Deacon Brodie’s pub.

Continue reading Marvin of Troy (Marvin Chodikoff and the Construction of the Mark Building, 1959)

The Glebe’s Good Sport

680 Bank Street, currently the home to Kunstadt Sports. Image: July 2014.
680 Bank Street, currently the home to Kunstadt Sports. Image: July 2014.
Note: as with any new toy, it will be used a fair amount more than it strictly necessary at first. That is, since I finally found a footnote tool that I like, I can finally add notes to these stories. Once the novelty wears off, I’m sure that I will use them more sparingly.

Business, such as it is, can either seem to be eternal or ephemeral. It sometimes feels that a business will last a century if it can last a year. Of course, the space a business occupies can also be as permanent or as fleeting. 680 Bank, at the south west corner of Bank and Clemow in The Glebe, has definitely seen its share of both types. To boot, both before and after the occupation of its longest-lasting tenant (Olympic Sport Shop, at nearly 40 years), this little-storefront-that-could has not once – but twice – served as temporary quarters for a Bank Street neighbour ravaged by fire.

In spite of the general excitement for apartment construction in Ottawa during the 1920s and 1930s, not all plans were able to materialize. Source: Ottawa Journal, March 27, 1930.
In spite of the general excitement for apartment construction in Ottawa during the 1920s and 1930s, not all plans were able to materialize. Source: Ottawa Journal, March 27, 1930.

Occasionally, a parcel of land will remain vacant long after those around it have been constructed on and the south west corner of Bank and Clemow is one of them. Plans come and go, but issues in timing, the raising of capital, or just plain lack of desire may see the lot remain empty. This lot, at least at one point, was coveted by a small consortium of local builders that had hatched a plan to construct a $200,000 apartment building. Just another example of unbuilt Ottawa.

Entry from the 1949 City Directory. Note that the stated position on the north west corner of Bank and Clemow is incorrect. It would amended in later editions of the directory. Source: Ottawa City Directory, 1949, Pink Page 19.
Entry from the 1949 City Directory. Note that the stated position on the north west corner of Bank and Clemow is incorrect. It would amended in later editions of the directory. Source: Ottawa City Directory, 1949, Pink Page 19.

This small building at 680 Bank Street in The Glebe first appeared in the Ottawa City Directories in 1948 as an office for the Department of Veterans’ Affairs (DVA). 1It has been somewhat difficult to reconcile the advertisements which appear in the local news papers with the record in the City Directories. While there do appear to be discrepancies between the advertisements published in the local papers and the listings in the directories, it would seem that company advertisements would be the more accurate of the two. This arrangement did not last long, however. This was probably due to the completion of the Veterans’ Memorial Building (East Memorial Building) in 1949 – allowing the number of small DVA offices around the city to be placed under a single roof.

Fire at 394 Bank. Source: Ottawa Journal, January 26, 1950, Page 1.
Fire at 394 Bank. Source: Ottawa Journal, January 26, 1950, Page 1.

On January 26, 1950, a large fire broke out up the street at 394 Bank causing an estimated $400,000 damage. 2It wasn’t even the first electrical fire that the building faced. During the summer of 1945, a short in the fuse panel in the National Labour Hall rendered the residents in the apartments on the third floor homeless. One of those residents was Mrs. Britton, whose husband Lionel was overseas at the time. In addition to leaving 10 homeless, a number of businesses also found themselves without a premises. Three of the businesses were destroyed in their entirety by the fire: the Colonial Art Glass Company, United Refrigeration, and most relevant to this story, the Canadian Tire Associate Store. 3CCB Electric Works, the Burroughs Adding Machine Company, and the National Labour Hall received considerable smoke and water damage The cause of the fire, as reported by Ottawa’s Fire Prevention Bureau, was a short circuit in Canadian Tire’s neon sign. Like most neon signs, it contained a 15,000 volt transformer and the short heated the wires enough to melt the metal covering. 4Ottawa Journal, January 27, 1950, pp. 1, 16. The Fire Prevention Bureau was established by the Ottawa Fire Department in 1914.

The first ad for Leroy and MacNish's Canadian Tire Associate Store. Super-Lastic was the corporation's brand of tires. Source: Ottawa Journal, June 8, 1935, Page 20.
The first ad for Leroy and MacNish’s Canadian Tire Associate Store. Super-Lastic was the corporation’s brand of tires. Source: Ottawa Journal, June 8, 1935, Page 20.

Of the businesses rendered homeless, it seems that none were more popular than the Canadian Tire Associate Store. Established in 1935 by business partners Ed Leroy and Malcolm MacNish, the store quickly outgrew its first premises at 398 Bank and by 1939, it had moved to the much larger storefront at 394 Bank.

It was distinctive Canadian Tire triangle logo that helped bring them in. It was also the neon-lit version that rendered the retailer homeless. Source: Ottawa Journal, February 1, 1950, Page 19.
Leroy and MacNish quickly sprung into action, promising that they’d be back in action quickly and hinting that the new store was ready to come soon. Source: Ottawa Journal, February 1, 1950, Page 19.

Following the destruction of the store in 1950, Leroy & MacNish moved quickly to find a temporary location from which to conduct business. The chosen location was none other than the recently-vacated premises at 680 Bank. The reason why it was a temporary location is because plans had already been made for the construction of a larger modern store. The Canadian Tire Corporation purchased a lot at the corner of Laurier and Kent from the Kirby Realty Co. for $30,000 back in February of 1945.

The property at Kent and Laurier was the highlight property transfer in February 1945. Source: Ottawa Journal, March 8, 1945, Page 7.
The property at Kent and Laurier was the highlight property transfer in February 1945. Source: Ottawa Journal, March 8, 1945, Page 7.

As the flames ravaged the location at 394 Bank, the wheels (tires?) were already in motion. A new store was indeed in the offing. One that would see the company step confidently into the new dawn of the postwar period (or at least, so the ad copy claimed).  The modern 21,000 square foot store at Kent and Laurier opened on July 5, 1952. The event was marked by the presence of acting Mayor L.L. Coulter and every customer that passed through was given a free “Spanish style Gaucho hat.”

1952-07-04-Full-Page-Ad-Kent-Laurier-Grand-Opening-Page-11-Display
Announcement of the Grant Opening. Source: Ottawa Journal, July 4, 1952, Page 11.
The opening was quite a party. Source: Ottawa Journal, July 10, 1952, Page 19.
The opening was quite a party. Source: Ottawa Journal, July 10, 1952, Page 19.

While occupying 680 Bank, it was quite clear that the premises was much too small for the popularity of the store. At only 3,200 square feet, Leroy and MacNish found themselves dealing with lineups out the door, no parking, and angry customers who showed their dissatisfaction by discarding their spent oil filters and tires nearby.

The only image of the former Westboro Canadian Tire that I was able to locate. Though it had been actually open for a part of 1953, its official grand opening was May 1, 1954.
The only image of the former Westboro Canadian Tire that I was able to locate. Though it had been actually open for a part of 1953, its official grand opening was May 1, 1954. Source: Watawa Life.

Of course, the Canadian Tire story in Ottawa continued further, with the opening of another store in Westboro two years later. Leroy continued with the Kent store while MacNish set sail for the Westboro location.

From the Ottawa City Directory, 1953. Once Canadian Tire departed, the Department of Fisheries rented out the space.
From the Ottawa City Directory, 1953. Once Canadian Tire departed, the Department of Fisheries rented out the space.

Following the departure of Canadian Tire in the Summer of 1952, the little building was once again put to use for federal government purposes: this time for the Department of Fisheries. As with the Department of Veterans’ Affairs before it, I am not certain about the function that the small office served for them. Once again, the Crown did not need the building for long and was gone by 1958. 5Though a small handful of advertisements in the Journal list Budget Motor Sales being at 680 Bank, the business was located at the back of the lot and had an address of 684 Bank. The 1956 fire insurance map shows the layout with 680 Bank as a Department of Fisheries warehouse and 684 Bank as a small structure at the back of the lot.
1956-Insurancehttps://i0.wp.com/www.historynerd.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/1956-Insurance.jpg?w=564&ssl=1
564w" sizes="(max-width: 280px) 100vw, 280px" />

During a fundraiser in 1961, Physiotherapist Margaret McCormack demonstrates some of the work of the recently-formed Ottawa Rehabilitation Institute with four-year-old Leslie Cody. Source: Ottawa Journal, January 14, 1961, Page 16.
During a fundraiser in 1961, Physiotherapist Margaret McCormack demonstrates some of the work of the recently-formed Ottawa Rehabilitation Institute with four-year-old Leslie Cody. Source: Ottawa Journal, January 14, 1961, Page 16.

The next tenant in the space was the Ottawa Rehabilitation Institute. The Institute was formed at the end of 1957 by the Welfare Council of Ottawa in order to provide rehabilitation services to Ottawans with physical disabilities. The Rehabilitation Centre did not remain there for long either. By 1967, it had formed a partnership with the Royal Ottawa and occupied some space there before moving to its own premises on Meadowlands.

The original Olympic Sports storefront at 753 Bank Street. Source: Ottawa Journal, October 26, 1967.
The old Olympic Sports storefront at 753 Bank Street. Today, it’s home to Naji’s. Source: Ottawa Journal, October 26, 1967.

A Glebe institution, Olympic Sports Shop was established by Karl Havelcik in 1952 and quickly moved to 753 Bank Street. While the Olympic shop began as a smoke shop with sports equipment being sold on the side, Havelcik, who had experience selling sports equipment in his native Vienna, developed a solid reputation in sports equipment. In addition to a mixture of high quality and low prices, Havelcik’s business was doubtlessly bolstered by his high level of community involvement as a popular soccer coach.

Olympic’s grand opening took place on October 26, 1967 and it quickly solidified as one of the Glebe’s favourite destinations for sporting goods.

 

Workers restore the facade of 680 Bank following the departure of Olympic Sports Shop. Source: Google Maps (Street View, October 2007).
Workers restore the facade of 680 Bank following the departure of Olympic Sports Shop. Source: Google Maps (Street View, October 2007).

In 2006, after nearly 40 years in that location and 55 years in business, Olympic closed its doors for good. While a number of plans were floated (including for an Irish Pub), the next to open was Pannier, a food shop. The Pannier then closed in 2008.

680 Bank once again provides temporary refuge. Image Source: Google Maps (Street View: June 2009)
680 Bank once again provides temporary refuge. Image Source: Google Maps (Street View: June 2009)

Once again, it was time for 680 Bank to be an obliging neighbour. In April 2009, the Tommy & Lefebvre, again up the street at 464 Bank, burned. While they were rebuilding, they conducted business at 680. By September of that same year, Kunstadt Sports 6Kunstadt appears to have been established in or around 1992. At least, that’s the first citation I was able to locate in the Ottawa Citizen‘s archives. took over and refurbished the space and has been there since. They are doubtlessly building the same relationship with The Glebe that Olympic did before it.

Notes

Notes
1 It has been somewhat difficult to reconcile the advertisements which appear in the local news papers with the record in the City Directories. While there do appear to be discrepancies between the advertisements published in the local papers and the listings in the directories, it would seem that company advertisements would be the more accurate of the two.
2 It wasn’t even the first electrical fire that the building faced. During the summer of 1945, a short in the fuse panel in the National Labour Hall rendered the residents in the apartments on the third floor homeless. One of those residents was Mrs. Britton, whose husband Lionel was overseas at the time.
3 CCB Electric Works, the Burroughs Adding Machine Company, and the National Labour Hall received considerable smoke and water damage
4 Ottawa Journal, January 27, 1950, pp. 1, 16. The Fire Prevention Bureau was established by the Ottawa Fire Department in 1914.
5 Though a small handful of advertisements in the Journal list Budget Motor Sales being at 680 Bank, the business was located at the back of the lot and had an address of 684 Bank. The 1956 fire insurance map shows the layout with 680 Bank as a Department of Fisheries warehouse and 684 Bank as a small structure at the back of the lot.
1956-Insurancehttps://i0.wp.com/www.historynerd.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/1956-Insurance.jpg?w=564&ssl=1 564w" sizes="(max-width: 280px) 100vw, 280px" />
6 Kunstadt appears to have been established in or around 1992. At least, that’s the first citation I was able to locate in the Ottawa Citizen‘s archives.

“An insult to the Greber Plan”

The much-hated Island Park Water Tower, in its final days (1988-89). Source: My Old Ottawa, via Lost Ottawa.
The much-hated Island Park Water Tower from the grounds of the Royal Ottawa in its final days (1988-89). Source: My Old Ottawa, via Lost Ottawa.

1950. 1950. 1950. 1950 was a major year for Ottawa. In addition to a rate and scale of (sub)urban growth that was entirely without precedent, the City of Ottawa had just put the finishing touches on an annexation of major swaths of Nepean and Gloucester Townships.

Of the many stories that can be told about such times of rapid change and development, one of the lesser-appreciated ones concerns infrastructure and the often problematic habit we have of building outside the serviced area in our efforts to depress development costs while simultaneously being (logically) unwilling to engage in meaningful preparatory build-out. The need for – and commotion over – the Island Park (Carling Avenue) Water Tower seems as good an illustration as any.

For any number of reasons, the Great Depression wasn’t as unkind to Ottawa as it was to other cities in Canada. In part thanks to the development of entirely new bureaucracies to manage the very necessary relief programs, Ottawa found itself in something of a housing shortage. While much of this was concentrated in the downtown area, areas such as Elmdale, Ottawa East, and the Civic Hospital experienced tremendous build-out during the Depression and Second World War.

Had that miniature construction boom been where the story ended, Ottawa’s then aging and substandard water infrastructure would have still been unable to service the residents that it did – let alone any additional large-scale developments. Indeed, a rather large number of lots in these outlying areas were, for all intents and purposes, unserviced. Well water and septic systems in dense neighbourhoods were worrying enough for the Health Department but at least those homes had the basics. There were a worrying number of homes that were serviced, at least in theory, but turning on the taps often resulted in little more than a trickle. A rather large number of homes for sale advertised pumping systems.

There was also the very problematic issue of fire services often being left with too little pressure to fight fires with. On more than one occasion in the 1930s and 1940s, pressure to the fire hydrants in these new outlying areas was far too weak and homes and businesses were lost as a result.

If all of that was not enough, development outside of Ottawa’s borders had picked up considerably. Nepean Township had come to experience a similar rate of development and, much like Eastview and Gloucester, had cut a deal with Ottawa to purchase water service. By the mid-1940s, Ottawa was having difficulties supplying residents of Nepean with water and they were placed under lawn watering restrictions. Not that they felt that they were receiving adequate service anyway.

Sorry Nepean, your proud midcentury lawns will be golden rather than emerald. Source: Ottawa Journal, July 8, 1948, Page 30.
Sorry Nepean, your proud midcentury lawns will be golden rather than emerald. Source: Ottawa Journal, July 8, 1948, Page 30.

In 1948, Ottawa’s Water Works Department constructed a booster pump on Carling Avenue at the foot of Sherwood (demolished in 2003-04). Reportedly under the assumption that much of the Elmdale/Civic/Island Park area’s water pressure issue was related to its relatively elevated topographical position, it was thought that the pump would solve the problem. At least this is how it was occasionally spun in the press when reporting on local grievances.

Suffice to say, while the diminutive brick pile would have been preferred by locals, it was only the first phase of a dramatic expansion of the city’s water system. City Hall watchers, who had read the Gore-Storrie Report, knew that the city’s west end was not only about to get a water tower, but also the Carlington Heights Reservoir.

The little booster pump that didn't. While it was probably an effective measure for some homes in the surrounding area, there was only so much it could do when much of the supply was being consumed before it made it.
The little booster pump that didn’t. At least not on its own. While most area residents would have preferred that it be the only measure needed, it was only part of a much larger project to improve the water service for the whole Ottawa area. Image source: geoOttawa (1958 Aerials).

Commensurate with what was outlined in Gore-Storrie, at the end of 1948 the Water Works Department issued a call for tenders for the construction of one 750,000 gallon water tower to be located on the northern edge of the Royal Ottawa Sanatorium’s property.

Problem? Meet Solution. Source: Ottawa Journal, February 24, 1950, Page 3.
Problem? Meet Solution. Source: Ottawa Journal, February 24, 1950, Page 3.

According to the Water Works Department’s 1949 Annual Report, only a single bid was received: from Horton Steel Works, the dominant player in water towers. Council approved the contract on February 7, city workers prepared the site through the summer months, and Horton began to erect the tower on December 13. It was expected that the tower would be complete in April 1950.

It was only when Horton began to erect the steel tower that Island Park residents became opposed. It probably did not help that the tower, until completion, was a more natural rusty colour. As John Dalrymple of the Journal reported:

It’s unprintable.

To irritated residents of Island Park Drive, over whose homes it soars like a giant sun-shade, it is ‘that unprintable plumbing fixture.’

Since the start of construction of the $210,000 project last December 20, neighbourhood residents have watched, first with mild interest and then with growing curiosity as the weird structure began to take shape.

Abstract curiosity gave way to alarm as it grew higher and higher, finally rearing into view over the house-tops, dominating the model homes and million dollar Federal District Commission Drive.

Although widely publicized since it was first conceived in 1946, many annoyed home-owners in the area claim that it was only in the past few weeks they had discovered what the project was, believing at first that it was some kind of addition to the Royal Ottawa Sanitorium, which it adjoins.

John Dalrymple, “Monstrous Skeleton Haunts Island Park,” Ottawa Journal, February 3, 1950, Page 3.

One of the interesting points to the Journal’s reporting through the whole ordeal is that it was clear that the paper was very much in favour of the project as it was being implemented. The complaints of Island Park’s residents did not seem to actually curry much sympathy in the pages of the paper. For example, in the same story quoted from above, Dalrymple notes that it was mentioned in the papers no less than 14 times in 1948 when it was decided upon. Furthermore, the site was the only suitable one that fulfilled all of the engineering needs of such a project. Given that in the summer months, the Lemieux Island pumping station’s 42 million gallon pumping capability was well short of demand, it only made sense that the project had to be seen through.

Nevertheless, the opposition quickly organized, and by March a group of Island Park residents was set to present their complaints to City Council. In looking back at these complaints, it becomes clear that terms like “eyesore” and “monstrosity” have always been quickly deployed. One unnamed resident of the area even characterized the water tower “an insult to the Greber Plan.” (!)

While Council may have been more open to residents' criticisms, the Board of Control was not going to be moved. Source: Ottawa Journal, March 15, 1950, Page 3.
While Council may have been more open to residents’ criticisms, the Board of Control was not going to be moved. Source: Ottawa Journal, March 15, 1950, Page 3.

Once their objections were brought before the Board of Control, it was over. The Board was completely in support of the plan as it was being implemented and they were not going to climb down. For them it was as much a matter of absolute need as it was annoyance with the timing of the neighbourhood group. Controller Pickering lambasted them, suggesting that “if [they] were too busy to take an interest in civic affairs at that time, don’t blame us now.”

There was one compromise, however. Rather than the silver-coloured aluminum paint finish that it was to have in the original design, it was going to be painted “a neutral colour, probably one used extensively in highway bridges, notably the Ivy Lea international span.”

As noted above, the Journal was quite vocal about the Island Park residents’ complaints. Following the Island Park residents’ loss at the Board of Control and the general quieting of the opposition, the paper published a number of articles and editorials dismissing the complaints.

The Journal went as far as comparing the popularity of the two water towers in Sudbury to the reaction of Island Park's residents. Source: Ottawa Journal, March 17, 1950, Page 3.
The Journal went as far as comparing the popularity of the two water towers in Sudbury to the reaction of Island Park’s residents. Source: Ottawa Journal, March 17, 1950, Page 3.

 

While Greber didn't find it to be an insult to his vision, he did not find it aesthetically pleasing. To this end, he assured residents that by painting it the aforementioned grey-green that it would be camouflaged. Source: Ottawa Journal, March 18, 1950.
While Greber didn’t find it to be an insult to his vision, he did not find it aesthetically pleasing. To this end, he assured residents that by painting it the aforementioned grey-green that it would be camouflaged. Source: Ottawa Journal, March 18, 1950.

Ultimately, the grey-green (almost looks like Cambridge Blue) paint did have a sort of camouflaging effect it seems. Once it became clear that the Island Park water tower was in reality more or less as camouflaged as it could be, objections were quieted and withdrawn for the other planned towers, including the one planned for Alta-Vista.

The Island Park water tower was officially put into operation on June 15, 1950 and while the Civic Hospital immediate received a much-needed increase in water pressure, the Citizen reported that when asked, surrounding residents hadn’t noticed much difference in their water pressure.

The Island Park water tower, complete with the long afternoon shadows. Source: geoOttawa (1958 Aerials)
The Island Park water tower, complete with the long afternoon shadows. Source: geoOttawa (1958 Aerials)

While those in the immediate surrounding area didn’t notice much change in pressure, Westboro’s residents did. Once their water main was connected to the tower it was calculated that they would receive a much-needed additional 15 pounds of pressure. Much like the nearby residents, they too didn’t notice much difference. In Westboro’s case, however, it was because their water main broke under the intersection of Richmond and Churchill, losing 500,000 gallons of water in the process. A combination of frost damage and additional pressure were thought to have caused the break.

The tower was a presence in the west end. Source: Lost Ottawa (n.d.)
The tower was a presence in the west end. Source: Lost Ottawa (n.d.)

The implementation of the Gore-Storrie Report was ultimately successful and the City of Ottawa was able to fulfill the water requirements of not only its own residents in the older parts of the city, but also the newly-annexed parts of Nepean and Gloucester Townships. It also allowed the sprawling suburban development to continue at the clip desired and, as time went on, even the homes that were without service, received it.

As the city’s water system was upgraded and modernized over the years, the water towers constructed in the 1950s became unnecessary. The one at Island Park was dismantled in 1989. At nearly 40 years old, its dismantling does not appear to have either been celebrated or lamented. Looking at the Lost Ottawa Facebook Group, it does appear to factor in the memories of thousands of Ottawans, however.

It same down in very much the same way that it went up. Source: Lost Ottawa / My Old Ottawa.
It same down in very much the same way that it went up. Source: Lost Ottawa / My Old Ottawa.

Nothing but clear skies now.

Island Park Drive, from a similar angle as the the construction photo that was published in the Journal. Source: Google Maps (Street View, Image date: August 2012)
Island Park Drive, from a similar angle as the the construction photo that was published in the Journal. Source: Google Maps (Street View, Image date: August 2012)

The Inflammable Dominion

On February 4, 1961, the elder statesman of Ottawa’s United Church community was destroyed by fire. The fire, reputedly the result of an unfortunate meeting between an electric heater and stacks of dry paper, resulted in $500,000 in damage. When it became clear that Ottawa’s developers were not interested in blending the ecclesiastical with the commercial (as they would later be with St. Andrew’s), Dominion United’s congregation and the nearby Chalmers voted to merge. If you’re attending the Ottawa Chamber Music Festival, this should ring a bell.

Continue reading The Inflammable Dominion

On February 4, 1961, the elder statesman of Ottawa’s United Church community was destroyed by fire. The fire, reputedly the result of an unfortunate meeting between an electric heater and stacks of dry paper, resulted in $500,000 in damage. When it became clear that Ottawa’s developers were not interested in blending the ecclesiastical with the commercial (as they would later be with St. Andrew’s), Dominion United’s congregation and the nearby Chalmers voted to merge. If you’re attending the Ottawa Chamber Music Festival, this should ring a bell.

Continue reading The Inflammable Dominion